Inventory Discrepancy Risk Analysis and Mitigation Prioritization at Finished Goods Warehouse Using the House of Risk Method
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51747/energy.v16i2.p270-287Keywords:
Inventory discrepancy, House of Risk, SCOR, Risk mitigation, Finished goods warehouseAbstract
Inventory discrepancy in finished goods warehouses reduces inventory accuracy and may disrupt warehouse operations and product distribution. This study was conducted at PT Alpha Plastic Manufacturing (a pseudonym), a plastic injection moulding company operating in the plastic manufacturing sector that manages a finished goods warehouse for injection-moulded components supplied for industrial applications. This study aims to analyze the causes of inventory discrepancy and determine appropriate mitigation strategies by integrating the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) model and the House of Risk (HOR) method. A descriptive quantitative approach was employed using observation, interviews, focus group discussions, company documents, and questionnaires involving three warehouse experts. The SCOR model was used to identify risk events and risk agents, while HOR Phase 1 prioritized risk agents using Aggregate Risk Potential (ARP), and HOR Phase 2 determined preventive actions based on the Effectiveness-to-Difficulty Ratio (ETD). The integration of SCOR and HOR provides a systematic approach to connect warehouse operational activities, priority risk sources, and feasible mitigation strategies. The results identified 10 risk events and 8 risk agents, with six priority risk agents contributing 86.36% of the total ARP value and five priority preventive actions contributing 66.97% of the total ETD value. Based on the investigated case, the findings indicate that strengthening warehouse procedures and operational controls should become the initial priority for reducing inventory discrepancy before implementing advanced inventory technologies.
References
[1] W. Villegas-Ch, A. M. Navarro, and S. Sanchez-Viteri, “Optimization of inventory management through computer vision and machine learning technologies,” Intell. Syst. with Appl., vol. 24, pp. 1–16, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.iswa.2024.200438.
[2] A. A. Tubis and J. Rohman, “Intelligent Warehouse in Industry 4.0—Systematic Literature Review,” Sensors, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 1–28, 2023, doi: 10.3390/s23084105.
[3] L. N. Tikwayo and T. N. D. Mathaba, “Applications of Industry 4.0 Technologies in Warehouse Management: A Systematic Literature Review,” Logistics, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2023, doi: 10.3390/logistics7020024.
[4] Y. S. Kendek, Mahfudnurnajamuddin, and Ramlawati, “Manajemen Persediaan dan Kinerja UMKM di Sektor Manufaktur di Kota Makassar,” J. Ilm. Edonomika, vol. 08, no. 04, pp. 1–9, 2024, doi: 10.29040/jie.v8i4.15542.
[5] Y.-S. Huang, J.-W. Ho, and W.-Y. Kao, “Availability and reliability of information transmission for supply chain coordination with demand information sharing,” Comput. Ind. Eng., vol. 172, p. 108642, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2022.108642.
[6] A. Wafa, D. A. S. Dewi, and A. Syukriadinata, “Analisis Ketidaksesuaian Data Stock Opname Material Pada Gudang Material Di PT UPX,” J. Ris. dan Apl. Tek. Ind., vol. 03, no. 03, pp. 177–184, 2025, doi: 10.24843.JRATI.2025.v03.i02.p07.
[7] F. Umariyah and A. T. Ranteallo, “Analisis Perbandingan Pengelolaan Persediaan secara Manual dan Penerapan Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Persediaan terhadap Akurasi Nilai Persediaan CV. Alfath Teknik Periode 2023–2024,” Indones. Econ. J., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1492–1498, 2025, doi: doi.org/10.63822/td9by403.
[8] J. manuel R. Andaur, G. A. Ruz, and M. Goycoolea, “Predicting Out-of-Stock Using Machine Learning : An Application in a Retail Packaged Foods Manufacturing Company,” Electronics, vol. 10, no. 22, pp. 1–28, 2021, doi: 10.3390/electronics10222787.
[9] N. DeHoratius, A. Holzapfel, H. Kuhn, A. J. Mersereau, and M. Sternbeck, “Evaluating Count Prioritization Procedures for Improving Inventory Accuracy in Retail Stores,” Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 288–306, 2023, doi: 10.1287/msom.2022.1119.
[10] F. Lestari, A. Mas’ari, S. Meilani, I. N. Riandika, and A. B. A. Hamid, “Risk Mitigation Via Integrating House of Risk and Probability Impact Matrix in Halal Food Supply Chain,” J. Tek. Ind., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 138–154, 2021, doi: 10.22219/jtiumm.vol22.no2.138-154.
[11] C. Kalla, L. F. Scavarda, and B. Hellingrath, “Integrating supply chain risk management activities into sales and operations planning,” Total Supply Chain Manag., vol. 19, pp. 467–497, 2024, doi: 10.4324/9780080561295-29.
[12] B. N. Alfa, P. D. Widayat, and B. Santoso, “Supply Chain Risk Management of Aftermarket Products in Automotive Spare Parts Manufacturing Companies Using the House of Risk ( HoR ) Method,” J. Ilm. Tek. Ind., vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 318–326, 2024, doi: 10.23917/jiti.v23i2.6226.
[13] F. Jiroyah and N. Muflihah, “Integrasi Model SCOR dan House of Risk untuk Menentukan Mitigasi Risiko Supply Chain Management Pada Proses Produksi (Studi Kasus Di CV. AR ROUF),” JITSA J. Ind. Teknol. Samawa, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 101–109, 2022.
[14] S. Alam, R. R. Putri, and S. Hartini, “Mitigating Supply Chain Risks in The Traditional Beverage Industry with The House of Risk ( HOR ) Method,” J. Ilm. Tek. Ind., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 17–30, 2025, doi: 10.23917/jiti.v24i1.4383.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ENERGY: JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU-ILMU TEKNIK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
