Nonlinear Trade-Off Between Agitator Speed and Biodiesel Quality in Transesterification: A Lab-Scale Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51747/energy.v16i1.1615Keywords:
Biodiesel, transesterification, Agigator Speed, Kinematic Viscosity, Yield, Flash PointAbstract
The agitator speed controls the intensity of interaction between the immiscible oil and methanol phases during transesterification. This, in turn, shapes the overall reaction environment during the biodiesel production process. While higher agitation rates are often associated with increased mass transfer, their impact on the resulting fuel properties is not always proportional. In a controlled laboratory setting, the effect of agitator speed was examined at 300, 500, 700, and 900 rpm, with particular attention paid to biodiesel yield, density, kinematic viscosity, and flash point. A gradual shift in system behavior became apparent as the agitation rate increased. In the intermediate range of 500–700 rpm, the process tended to stabilize, producing biodiesel with relatively consistent characteristics. The measured kinematic viscosity was between 4.42 and 4.45 cSt, accompanied by a density of approximately 861 kg/m³. However, pushing the system to higher agitation rates led to a different response. At 900 rpm, the yield dropped sharply to 49.53%, and the viscosity increased to 4.92 cSt. This behavior indicates the onset of unfavorable hydrodynamic conditions, where intensive mixing likely disrupts phase separation and promotes the formation of a stable emulsion. Meanwhile, the flash point continued to increase from 124.7 °C to 166.8 °C, indicating a progressive decrease in residual methanol. Overall, these observations suggest that the influence of stirrer speed is governed by competing mechanisms rather than a simple monotonic trend. Operation in the 500–700 rpm range appears to offer a more reliable compromise, where conversion and fuel properties remain balanced. From an engineering perspective, this range provides a useful reference for establishing operating conditions in biodiesel reactors, especially when considering process development beyond the laboratory scale while maintaining consistent product quality.
References
[1] A. Aljaafari et al., “Biodiesel Emissions: A State-of-the-Art Review on Health and Environmental Impacts,” Energies, vol. 15, no. 18, pp. 1–24, 2022, doi: 10.3390/en15186854.
[2] A. A. Alrubaiy, R. M. Aljuhashy, and B. A. R. Al-Bakri, “Experimental Investigation of Diesel-WCOB Engine Performance with A Small Proportion of Ethanol/Isobutanol as A Fuel Additive,” Int. J. Integr. Eng., vol. 15, no. 7, pp. 82–88, 2023, doi: 10.30880/ijie.2023.15.07.008.
[3] Y. Lee et al., “Review Article Recent Advances in Electrocatalytic Transesteri fi cation : Enhancing Biodiesel Synthesis for Sustainable Energy,” Int. J. Energy Res., vol. 2025, no. 2, p. 2, 2025, doi: 10.1155/er/7887020.
[4] D. Christopher Selvam et al., “The role of biodiesel in marine decarbonization: Technological innovations and ocean engineering challenges,” Results Eng., vol. 25, no. January, p. 103974, 2025, doi: 10.1016/j.rineng.2025.103974.
[5] I. S. A. Manaf et al., “A review for key challenges of the development of biodiesel industry,” Energy Convers. Manag., vol. 185, no. 3, pp. 508–517, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.enconman.2019.02.019.
[6] D. H. T. Prasetiyo, A. Sanata, R. Sidartawan, M. Trifiananto, A. Abidin, and L. K. Supraptiningsih, “Study of Viscosity and Density Changes of Waste Cooking Oil Biodiesel Due to Gradual Heat Treatment,” Energy J. Ilm. Ilmu-Ilmu Tek., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2025, doi: 10.51747/energy.v15i1.1511.
[7] I. R. Sugara and D. H. T. Prasetiyo, “Enhancing Combustion Characteristics of Callophyllum Inophyllum Fuel Using Magnetic,” ENERGY J. Ilm. ILMU-ILMU Tek., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 13–25, 2025, doi: 10.51747/energy.v15i1.1512.
[8] Elvita Eka Nursari, Widya Ningrum, Ersyzario Edo Yunata, Evi Suaebah, and Rohim Amirullah Firdaus, “Review : Sintesis Nanopartikel Silika Dari Beberapa Material Dengan Metode Sol-Gel,” Inov. Fis. Indones., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 115–123, 2025, doi: 10.26740/ifi.v14n1.p115-123.
[9] A. Arumugam and V. Ponnusami, “Biodiesel production from Calophyllum inophyllum oil a potential non-edible feedstock: An overview,” Renew. Energy, vol. 131, pp. 459–471, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2018.07.059.
[10] U. Demir, S. Çelebi, and S. Özer, “Experimental investigation of the effect of fuel oil, graphene and HHO gas addition to diesel fuel on engine performance and exhaust emissions in a diesel engine,” Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, vol. 52, no. 4, pp. 1434–1446, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.08.007.
[11] Y. D. Bizualem and A. G. Nurie, “A review on recent biodiesel intensification process through cavitation and microwave reactors: Yield, energy, and economic analysis,” Heliyon, vol. 10, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24643.
[12] A. T. Suryawati and M. Ilmi, “The Effect of Various Agitation Speeds on Lipid Production from Fungal BR 2 . 2 Isolate,” in IcoBioSE, Atlantis Press International BV, 2023, pp. 544–550. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-166-1.
[13] S. M. Alagha and S. R., “Review the studies of mass transfer and kinetic modeling for production the biodiesel by the transesterification method and the impact of some selected factors,” in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2023, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1232/1/012014.
[14] D. Wulandani and Ibrahim, “Design and performance test of biodiesel reactor using hellical screw agitator and baffles,” in IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2022, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/1038/1/012024.
[15] V. Polishсhuk, S. Tarasenko, I. Antypov, N. Kozak, A. Zhyltsov, and A. Bereziuk, “Investigation of the Efficiency of Wet Biodiesel Purification,” in ICoRES, 2020, pp. 1–14. doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202015402006.
[16] K. A. Zahan and M. Kano, “Technological Progress in Biodiesel Production: An Overview on Different Types of Reactors,” in International Conference on Power and Ener y Systems Engineering, Elsevier B.V., 2019, pp. 452–457. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2018.11.086.
[17] I. O. Akpan, I. Edeh, and L. Uyigue, “A Review on Biodiesel Production,” Pet. Chem. Ind. Int., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 131–141, 2023, doi: 10.33140/PCII.06.02.11.
[18] M. Athar and S. Zaidi, “Journal ofEnvironmental Chemical Engineering,” Biochem. Pharmacol., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.104523.
[19] M. Ali, M. Shahid, W. Saeed, and S. Imran, “Design, Fabrication, and Operation of a 10 L Biodiesel Production Unit Powered by Conventional and Solar Energy Systems,” Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 12, pp. 9734–9750, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su15129734.
[20] F. Danane, R. Bessah, R. Alloune, L. Tebouche, and F. Madjene, “Experimental optimization of Waste Cooking Oil ethanolysis for biodiesel production using Response Surface Methodology ( RSM ),” Sci. Technol. Energy Transit., vol. 14, no. 10, pp. 1–10, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.2516/stet/2022014 REGULAR.
[21] M. Zhang, M. Y. Lee, S. We, and H. Wu, “Direct emulsification of crude glycerol and bio-oil without addition of surfactant via ultrasound and mechanical agitation,” Fuel, vol. 227, no. October 2017, pp. 183–189, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.099.
[22] L. Razzaq et al., “Modeling Viscosity and Density of Ethanol-Diesel- Biodiesel Ternary Blends for Sustainable Environment,” Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 1–20, 2020, doi: doi.org/10.3390/su12125186.
[23] K. R. Bukkarapu and A. Krishnasamy, “A study on the effects of compositional variations of biodiesel fuel on its physiochemical properties,” Biofuels, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 523–535, 2018, doi: doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2018.1501638.
[24] A. Casas, Á. Pérez, and M. J. Ramos, “Effects of Diacetinmonoglycerides and Triacetin on Biodiesel Quality,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 16, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: doi.org/10.3390/en16176146.
[25] J. Wang et al., “Intensifying biofuel production using a novel bionic flow-induced peristaltic reactor : biodiesel production as a case study,” Biofuels, vol. 36, pp. 1721–1735, 2022, doi: 10.18331/BRJ2022.9.4.3.
[26] A. T. Hoang, “Prediction of the density and viscosity of biodiesel and the influence of biodiesel properties on a diesel engine fuel supply system,” J. Mar. Eng. Technol., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 299–311, 2021, doi: 10.1080/20464177.2018.1532734.
[27] K. Shojae, M. Mahdavian, B. Khoshandam, and H. Karimi-maleh, “Improving of CI engine performance using three different types of biodiesel,” Process Saf. Environ. Prot., vol. 149, pp. 977–993, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.03.048.
[28] M. U. Kaisan, F. O. Anafia, J. Nuszkowskib, D. M. Kullaa, and S. Umaru, “Calorific value, flash point and cetane number of biodiesel from cotton, jatropha and neem binary and multi-blends with diesel,” Biofules, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 321–327, 2020, doi: 10.1080/17597269.2017.1358944.
[29] Y. S. Pradana, I. G. B. N. Makertihartha, A. Indarto, T. Prakoso, and T. H. Soerawidjaja, “A Review of Biodiesel Cold Flow Properties and Its Improvement Methods : Towards Sustainable Biodiesel Application,” Energies, vol. 17, no. 18, pp. 1–43, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/en17184543.
[30] D. Russo, M. Portarapillo, and A. Di Benedetto, “Flash point of biodiesel/glycerol/alcohol mixtures for safe processing and storage,” J. Loss Prev. Process Ind., vol. 83, no. 3, pp. 1–7, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jlp.2023.105077.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 ENERGY: JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU-ILMU TEKNIK
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
