CTDI-Based Assessment of Radiation Dose Output Accuracy in a 128-Slice CT Scanner Using Head and Body PMMA Phantoms

Authors

  • Mochamad Haris P Department of Electromedical Engineering, University Kadiri, 64115, Indonesia Author
  • A. Santika Hyperastuty Department of Electromedical Engineering, University Kadiri, 64115, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51747/energy.v16i1.16111

Keywords:

Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI), CT Dose display accuracy, CT Dosimetri, Radiation Output Verification, CT Quality Assurance

Abstract

Verification of Computed Tomography Dose Index (CTDI)-based dose output is essential for ensuring the accuracy of radiation delivery and supporting quality assurance in Computed Tomography (CT). This study aimed to verify the radiation dose output of a 128-slice CT scanner at the Radiology Department of RS Jiwa Menur Surabaya using CTDI measurements with standard PMMA head (16 cm) and body (32 cm) phantoms. Dose measurements were performed using a 100 mm pencil ionization chamber under standardized exposure parameters of 120 kV and 200 mA. CTDI100 values were measured at the center and peripheral positions of each phantom and subsequently used to calculate CTDIw and CTDIvol. The measured CTDI values were compared with the corresponding dose indices displayed by the CT scanner to determine the percentage deviation. The measured CTDIvol showed a deviation of 10.65% from the displayed value, while the body phantom exhibited a deviation of 10.16%. Although the measured CTDI values were consistently higher in the head phantom than in the body phantom due to differences in attenuation characteristics and phantom geometry, all deviations remained within the ±20% tolerance limit specified by BAPETEN regulations. These findings indicate that the CT scanner's dose output performance is consistent with the applicable regulatory acceptance criteria. Periodic CTDI-based verification is recommended to support ongoing quality assurance, maintain dosimetric accuracy, and optimize radiation protection practices in accordance with the ALARA principle.

References

[1] S. S. Putri, S. H. Intifadhah, and E. R. Putri, “Estimation of Organ Dose , Effective Dose , and Cancer Risk in Abdominal CT Scan Patients,” vol. 50, no. xxx, pp. 289–294, 2024.

[2] S. Agoes Hyperastuty, Y. Mukhammad, and B. Andayani, “Analisis Pengaturan Faktor Eksposi Dosis Serap Pasien Menggunakan Piranha 557,” Med. Tek. J. Tek. Elektromedik Indones., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 126–130, 2023.

[3] R. Filano, I. G. E. Dirgayussa and A. Alfarabi, “Advancements and Challenges of Deep Learning in Diagnostic Radiology : A Systematic Literature Review,” Jurnal Fisikavol. 15, no. 2, pp. 38–50, 2025.

[4] N. M. Parwati, “Penyelenggaraan Layanan Kedokteran Nuklir Di Rumah Sakit Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 5 Tahun 2021 Tentang Perizinan Berusaha Berbasis Risiko Serta Aspek Pertanggungjawabannya" Jurnal P. Magister Hukum FH Unmas,” vol. 02, no. 02, pp. 102–112, 2022,

[5] P. S. Horuoby, A. Agung, A. Diartama, I. K. Sukadana, and P. Shalry, “Analisis Nilai CTDI vol Dan DLP Pada Pemeriksaan CT Scan Brain Non Kontras Dewasa Untuk Periode Januari – Desember 2022 Di Instalasi Radiologi Rumah Sakit X Jakarta Pusat Akademik Teknik Radiodiagnostik dan Radioterapoi Bali , Indonesia kepala , thorax , abdomen dan sebagainya . Pemeriksaan CT Scan yang sering dilakukan yaitu,” Jurnal Rummpun Ilmu Kesehatan., vol. 3, no. 3, 2023.

[6] I. Ilham, S. Zelviani, J. Jumardin, and K. Bariah, “ANALISIS NILAI COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY DOSE INDEX ( CTDI ) PADA PHANTOM KEPALA DI INSTALASI RADIOLOGI RUMAH SAKIT UMUM,” Jurnal Fisikaa vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 55–61, 2024.

[7] A. Santika Hyperastuty, Y. Mukhammad, and S. Sugeng, “Journal of Health Science,” J. Heal. Sci. (Jurnal Ilmu Kesehatan), vol. VI, no. I, pp. 19–26, 2021.

[8] International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), "Dosimetry in Diagnostic Radiology: An International Code of Practice," Technical Reports Series No. 457, Vienna, Austria, 2007.

[9] American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM), "The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT," AAPM Report No. 96, Maryland, USA, 2008.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-27

How to Cite

CTDI-Based Assessment of Radiation Dose Output Accuracy in a 128-Slice CT Scanner Using Head and Body PMMA Phantoms. (2026). ENERGY: JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU-ILMU TEKNIK, 16(1), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.51747/energy.v16i1.16111